Binance sued by Oct. 7 victims’ families for allegedly aiding Hamas through crypto exchange

North America
Source: CNBCPublished: 11/25/2025, 14:08:17 EST
Binance
Crypto Regulation
Anti-Money Laundering
Terrorist Financing
Changpeng Zhao
Legal Litigation
Zhao Changpeng, founder and chief executive officer of Binance, attends the Viva Technology conference dedicated to innovation and startups at Porte de Versailles exhibition center in Paris, France June 16, 2022.

News Summary

Families of victims from the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attacks in Israel have sued Binance, alleging the top cryptocurrency trading platform knowingly helped transfer hundreds of millions of dollars in support of terrorist activities. The lawsuit was filed one month after U.S. President Donald Trump pardoned Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ), who had pleaded guilty to failing to combat money laundering. Plaintiffs claim Binance was intentionally designed as a "criminal enterprise" to facilitate global money laundering and knowingly assisted terrorist organizations like Hamas, the IRGC, Hezbollah, and PIJ in transacting on its platform for years. The suit also highlights Hamas publicly directing donors to send funds to "crypto wallets" held with Binance.

Background

On October 7, 2023, Hamas launched a large-scale attack on Israel, resulting in significant civilian casualties and prompting widespread international concern over terrorist financing. Binance, once the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange, and its founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ), faced accusations from the U.S. Department of Justice in late 2023 for failing to maintain an effective Anti-Money Laundering (AML) program. This culminated in a settlement where Binance agreed to pay over $4.3 billion in penalties, and CZ stepped down as CEO and pleaded guilty. He was sentenced to four months in prison and released in September 2024. On October 23, 2024, U.S. President Donald Trump pardoned CZ, with the White House framing it as redress for a victim of the previous Biden administration's "war on cryptocurrency." This pardon, coupled with reports of Trump's family's financial ties to the crypto industry and Binance itself, has generated considerable public debate.

In-Depth AI Insights

What complex implications could this lawsuit against Binance, coming after President Trump's pardon of CZ, have on the regulatory outlook for the cryptocurrency industry? - The pardon and the lawsuit present a stark contrast, highlighting potential internal divisions within the U.S. government regarding crypto regulation: a presidential push for a crypto-friendly environment versus the judicial system's pursuit of accountability for terror financing on crypto platforms. - This could lead to increased public and political pressure on regulatory bodies (e.g., CFTC, SEC, Treasury) to take a tougher stance on KYC/AML enforcement, balancing innovation with national security concerns. - Investors might become wary of crypto projects perceived to have strong political ties, as such connections could introduce unpredictable legal and reputational risks. Given the Trump family's financial ties to the crypto industry, how might this lawsuit affect market perception of the fairness and transparency of U.S. crypto policy? - The allegations of Hamas using Binance, coupled with the reported financial links between the Trump family and Binance, could intensify concerns about conflicts of interest, eroding trust in the impartiality of U.S. crypto policy. - This concern might lead investors and businesses to focus more on political risk factors rather than solely market fundamentals when assessing the long-term stability and predictability of the U.S. crypto market. - International investors and regulators may closely watch this case as a test of U.S. resolve and capability in governing crypto risks, potentially influencing global crypto regulatory cooperation efforts. What does this lawsuit signify for Binance's long-term strategy and its commitment to compliance? - Despite Binance's claims of a "wide-ranging transformation," this new lawsuit, following its prior settlement with the U.S. government, indicates its compliance efforts still face significant challenges and external scrutiny. A loss could result in substantial damages and further brand reputation damage. - Binance will likely need to invest even more heavily in fortifying its AML and CTF systems, going beyond minimum regulatory requirements to rebuild trust and avoid future legal entanglements. - The lawsuit might push Binance towards a more conservative strategy in market expansion and product innovation, prioritizing operations in established and clearly regulated markets, and avoiding activities associated with high-risk jurisdictions to mitigate systemic risks to its global operations.