Nvidia Now Larger Than 6 Out Of 11 US Sectors—Tom Lee Says It's 'Cheaper Than Costco:' AI Stocks Still In 'Really Good Shape'

North America
Source: Benzinga.comPublished: 11/11/2025, 06:08:17 EST
Nvidia
AI Chips
Market Concentration
Tech Stock Valuation
S&P 500
Nvidia Now Larger Than 6 Out Of 11 US Sectors—Tom Lee Says It's 'Cheaper Than Costco:' AI Stocks Still In 'Really Good Shape'

News Summary

Nvidia's market capitalization has surged to $4.8 trillion, now comprising 8.5% of the S&P 500 and exceeding the combined market caps of 6 out of 11 US sectors (including Materials, Real Estate, and Utilities) and over 240 of the smallest S&P 500 companies, indicating unprecedented market concentration. Despite Nvidia's immense scale, Fundstrat's Tom Lee maintains that the AI sector is fundamentally

Background

In 2025, AI chip companies, epitomized by Nvidia, continue to lead the technology market, driving significant stock price and market cap appreciation. This growth has sparked concerns among market participants about potential valuation bubbles and excessive market concentration. Tom Lee, head of Fundstrat, is known for his often optimistic market forecasts, particularly regarding tech stocks and AI. His views frequently contrast with mainstream bearish sentiment, lending him a degree of influence among investors. He is once again expressing strong confidence in Nvidia's valuation and the sustained performance of the AI sector.

In-Depth AI Insights

What are the structural risks to the S&P 500 from Nvidia's extreme market concentration? - Nvidia's 8.5% weight in the S&P 500, far exceeding historical single-company concentration, makes the index's performance excessively dependent on one company, increasing overall market volatility and systemic risk. - This concentration may mask underlying weaknesses in hundreds of other companies within the index, leading investors to misjudge the overall health of the market. - A significant correction in Nvidia's stock would have a disproportionately large impact on the entire S&P 500, posing substantial risks to passive index funds and broad-based ETFs. Is Tom Lee's argument, blaming market nervousness on 'underperforming fund managers,' a deliberate attempt to downplay potential valuation risks? - Lee's argument could be a strategy to maintain the bullish narrative for the AI sector by shifting focus, especially when the market is uneasy about high valuations. - While fund managers may indeed face performance pressure, this does not entirely negate valid market concerns about Nvidia's and the broader AI sector's potentially stretched valuations. Attributing market worries solely to manager underperformance ignores macroeconomic shifts and interest rate environments affecting valuation multiples. - Such rhetoric might also aim to encourage year-end 'chasing the rally' behavior, thereby supporting stock prices in the short term, but fundamentals and valuations will eventually revert to mean in the long run. Can the 'visibility' of AI spending and innovation indefinitely support Nvidia's current valuation and future growth? - The current strong momentum in AI spending and continuous innovation are undoubtedly key drivers for Nvidia's growth, but this 'visibility' can be misleading. The cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry and potential for increased competition could lead to future demand fluctuations or margin compression. - As AI technology matures and becomes more widespread, its growth rate may decelerate, while more competitors enter the market, challenging Nvidia's market share and pricing power. Furthermore, regulatory scrutiny and supply chain disruption risks could add uncertainty. - Investors need to differentiate between strong short-term demand and long-term sustainable growth, and be wary of the market overpricing 'future prospects.' Current valuations have largely discounted several years of future growth potential.