Elon Musk Dropped the Name of a Possible Chip Partner for Tesla Last Night
%3Amax_bytes(150000)%3Astrip_icc()%3Aformat(webp)%2FIntel-Tesla-eef1c628a4c7472198fb6a8313ac2f4e.jpg&w=1920&q=75)
News Summary
Tesla CEO Elon Musk told investors at the company's shareholder meeting that Tesla would need a "gigantic" semiconductor fabrication plant to support its AI and robotics ambitions and that he's considering working with Intel to make new chips. Following the news, Intel's shares climbed in early trading before paring back gains, while Tesla shares were down about 4%. Analysts suggest a potential deal with Tesla would mark another significant step in Intel's turnaround plan, particularly if it involved its foundry manufacturing business. Additionally, the move could buy some political goodwill for Tesla after a public spat between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump earlier this year. Intel's stock has surged over 85% in 2025, largely due to a series of recent deals, including a partnership with Nvidia brokered by President Trump, which gave the U.S. government a 10% stake in Nvidia. However, analysts maintain neutral or bearish ratings on Intel, noting the lack of foundry commitments in these recent deals.
Background
Tesla has increasingly shifted its focus towards AI and robotics, necessitating a robust semiconductor supply chain. Intel has been working to revitalize its foundry manufacturing business, which has struggled to attract new clients, and is a key component of its overall turnaround plan. Intel's stock has surged over 85% in 2025, largely following a series of high-profile deals brokered by the Trump administration, including a partnership with AI chip leader Nvidia, which saw the U.S. government acquire a 10% stake in Nvidia. Earlier this year, Elon Musk had a public spat with the incumbent U.S. President Donald Trump, creating a need for Tesla to mend its relationship with the administration. In the current political climate, engaging in deals with companies favored by the government is seen as an opportunity to gain political goodwill.
In-Depth AI Insights
What are the true motivations behind Musk's public statement, beyond just chip supply? - While ostensibly about meeting Tesla's growing AI chip needs, his public mention of Intel likely carries deeper strategic and political considerations. - Market Testing and Leverage: Musk might be gauging market and Intel's reactions to a potential collaboration, which could also serve as leverage in future negotiations with Intel or any other potential chip partners. - Political Goodwill: Given Musk's prior public disagreements with the Trump administration, aligning with Intel—a company closely connected to and supported by the Trump government—is an effective way for Tesla to improve its political standing and potentially gain regulatory support and policy benefits. This is especially crucial under an "America First" industrial policy. How would a potential deal specifically impact Intel's foundry business and its role in the Trump administration's "Made in America" strategy? - Catalyst for Foundry Business: Despite analyst skepticism regarding Intel's foundry commitments, a potential partnership with a high-profile client like Tesla would be a significant win for Intel's foundry business. It would provide much-needed credibility and revenue, attracting more clients and validating its technological capabilities. - Reinforcing "Made in America" Strategy: Under the Trump administration's emphasis on domestic manufacturing, a Tesla-Intel collaboration, particularly involving the construction of a "gigantic" fabrication plant in the U.S., would perfectly align with and strengthen the strategic goal of "Made in America" chips. This could lead to further government subsidies, tax incentives, or regulatory support for Intel. - Enhanced Geopolitical Standing: As a flagship U.S. chip manufacturer, Intel's alliance with a tech titan like Tesla would further solidify its core role in U.S. technological sovereignty and supply chain security, potentially granting it more policy advantages in international competition. Despite Intel's stock surge, analysts maintain neutral or bearish ratings. What underlying risks does this reveal? - Concerns over Lack of Foundry Commitments: A key risk is that many of Intel's recent high-profile deals (e.g., with Nvidia) have not come with explicit foundry manufacturing commitments. This indicates that the market and analysts remain skeptical about Intel's ability to translate its advanced manufacturing technology into a stable, revenue-generating foundry business. - Execution Risk and Cost: Building a "gigantic" fabrication plant requires astronomical investment and takes years, posing extreme execution challenges. Intel has faced prior challenges in process technology development and mass production, leading investors to question its ability to deliver such complex projects on time and budget. - Intense Competition: The global foundry market is intensely competitive, with established giants like TSMC possessing mature ecosystems and technological leads. Intel needs to prove it can offer not just technology but also cost-effective and reliable capacity to truly shift analyst sentiment.