BofA CEO Warns Of 'Malaise,' Top Economist Sees Recession Risk As Shutdown Drags On, But Stock Market Is Unfazed

North America
Source: Benzinga.comPublished: 10/31/2025, 07:14:31 EDT
US Government Shutdown
Recession Risk
Market Resilience
Macroeconomics
Federal Reserve
BofA CEO Warns Of 'Malaise,' Top Economist Sees Recession Risk As Shutdown Drags On, But Stock Market Is Unfazed

News Summary

Leading economic figures are issuing stark warnings that the month-long U.S. government shutdown is beginning to "materially damage" the economy. Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan cautioned that the prolonged standoff risks causing economic "malaise," while Moody's Analytics chief economist Mark Zandi stated a recession is "more likely than not" if the impasse lasts through the end of the year. Moynihan explained the shutdown is "going to slow down the economy" because essential government functions have "ground to a halt," with activities like SEC approvals for IPOs and government contracting frozen, "detrimentally" impacting private sector businesses. Zandi added that as unpaid government workers "pull back on their spending" and contractors lay off staff, the "hit to the economy will mount," warning that if the shutdown "extends into the Christmas buying season," it will hurt retailers and magnify economic damage. Despite these dire macroeconomic forecasts, the stock market appears unfazed. Ryan Detrick of Carson Research noted the S&P 500 was "up nearly 3%" during the current 30-day shutdown, which he called "pretty standard." Historical data shows the market's average return during shutdowns is nearly flat (0.2%), but the S&P 500 has averaged a 12.7% gain in the 12 months after they end.

Background

The current context is 2025, with the U.S. government having been in a shutdown for a month. This shutdown is occurring during the second term of President Donald J. Trump, who was re-elected in November 2024. Government shutdowns typically arise from impasses between Congress and the executive branch over budget or policy issues, leading to the closure of non-essential government services and the furlough or unpaid work of federal employees. Historically, the economic impact of a government shutdown depends on its duration. While short-term shutdowns often have limited effects, prolonged impasses can materially damage economic activity by freezing regulatory approvals, disrupting government contracts, and eroding consumer and business confidence. This particular shutdown raises concerns about the interruption of critical government functions and its direct financial impact on both the private sector and federal employees.

In-Depth AI Insights

What are the deeper political motivations driving this prolonged shutdown under the Trump administration, and how might they influence its duration and economic fallout? - This shutdown may not be merely a superficial budget impasse. Under President Trump, government shutdowns have arguably been utilized as a hardball negotiation tactic to press Congress on significant policy or legislative agendas. This could reflect an administration attempting to reshape the functions and size of specific agencies or departments. - Given Trump's modus operandi, the shutdown's duration could be longer than initially discounted by the market, as compromise might be perceived as weakness. This political resolve could exacerbate economic impacts, especially at critical junctures like the Christmas buying season, as economic consequences might be viewed as a necessary cost to achieve political objectives. While the market appears "unfazed," what specific sectors or asset classes are most vulnerable to extended government paralysis, and where might unexpected opportunities arise? - Most Vulnerable Areas: - Government Contractors and Regulatory-Dependent Industries: Companies deriving significant revenue from federal contracts, or industries requiring SEC approvals (e.g., IPOs) and other federal permits (e.g., biotech, certain financial services), will face cash flow disruptions and project delays. - Retail and Consumer Discretionary: If the shutdown extends into the holiday shopping season, plummeting consumer confidence and disrupted incomes for federal employees will severely hit retail sales, particularly in regions with high concentrations of federal workers. - Regional Economies: Areas heavily reliant on federal employment, such as the Washington D.C. metropolitan area, will suffer disproportionately, potentially leading to a sharp slowdown in local economic activity. - Potential Opportunities: - Defensive Assets and Safe Havens: As recessionary risks escalate, defensive stocks (e.g., utilities, consumer staples) and safe-haven assets (e.g., gold, high-quality bonds) may see increased demand. - Non-Cyclical Sectors or Companies with International Focus: Firms less exposed to U.S. domestic government activity or those with robust international revenue streams might demonstrate resilience. - Distressed Asset Opportunities: Should the shutdown trigger liquidity issues for specific businesses or sectors, it could present opportunities for well-capitalized investors to acquire distressed assets at discounted valuations. How might a prolonged shutdown under the Trump administration specifically differ in its economic and market implications compared to previous administrations, especially concerning policy response and investor confidence? - Policy Response: A Trump administration may be more inclined to pursue bold and unconventional policy responses to address economic pressures from a shutdown, perhaps exploring executive orders or other non-traditional fiscal interventions, rather than solely relying on congressional negotiation. This could lead to increased unpredictability in policy pathways. - Investor Confidence: The market might perceive the Trump administration's capacity and willingness to navigate crises differently. On one hand, its "America First" economic agenda could provide resilience in certain areas; on the other, its confrontational negotiation style might heighten uncertainty, leading investors to be more volatile and cautious when facing political stalemates. Investors may pay closer attention to direct White House pronouncements and actions rather than traditional economic indicators or congressional dynamics. This dynamic could lead to more dramatic and swift market reactions to any signals from the White House.