Chinese vice-premier vows further opening up of financial sector

Greater China
Source: South China Morning PostPublished: 10/29/2025, 07:45:01 EDT
Financial Opening
US-China Relations
Foreign Financial Institutions
Macroeconomic Policy
National Financial Regulatory Administration
Vice-Premier He Lifeng meets members of the National Financial Regulatory Administration’s International Advisory Council in Beijing on Tuesday. Photo: Xinhua

News Summary

Chinese Vice-Premier He Lifeng reaffirmed China's commitment to expanding the "high-level opening up" of its financial sector during a meeting with the National Financial Regulatory Administration’s International Advisory Council. He emphasized a welcoming stance towards increased investment from foreign financial institutions and long-term capital, alongside deeper cooperation. The Vice-Premier also provided an update on China's economic and trade relationship with the United States. This followed his recent talks in Malaysia with US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, which the Chinese side reported as achieving "basic consensuses." These discussions are a prelude to an upcoming meeting between President Xi Jinping and US President Donald Trump in South Korea. Members of the International Advisory Council, comprising leaders from foreign financial firms, conveyed their optimism regarding China's economic and financial outlook, expressing their intent to further cultivate the Chinese market and expand investment and cooperation.

Background

China's financial market has gradually opened up to foreign investment over the past few years, including easing foreign ownership caps and expanding business scopes. However, geopolitical tensions and US-China trade friction have introduced uncertainty for foreign capital entering the Chinese market, especially during the Trump administration's tenure, which has often adopted protectionist trade policies towards China. Vice-Premier He Lifeng's recent comments come ahead of high-level economic dialogues between China and the US, and a presidential meeting, indicating China's continued commitment to attracting foreign investment and stabilizing expectations through openness, even amidst a complex international environment. Meanwhile, international financial institutions generally maintain interest in the long-term potential of the Chinese market but often harbor concerns regarding market access, regulatory transparency, and policy stability.

In-Depth AI Insights

What are the true motivations behind China's renewed emphasis on financial opening at this specific juncture? China's renewed emphasis on financial opening amidst a complex international environment likely stems from motivations beyond simply attracting foreign capital. - Stabilizing market expectations and confidence: Against a backdrop of structural economic challenges and increased external uncertainties, reaffirming an open stance helps stabilize both domestic and international investor confidence in the Chinese economy, particularly in 2025 when major central banks like the Federal Reserve are tightening monetary policy and global liquidity is constrained. - Hedging geopolitical risks: Facing potentially continued hardline policies from the Trump administration towards China, deepening financial openness to attract more 'sticky' long-term capital can partially hedge against potential decoupling risks, making China more indispensable within the global financial system. - Promoting internal reform and competitiveness: Introducing more foreign financial institutions not only brings capital but also advanced management expertise, products, and services, which can enhance the overall competitiveness and efficiency of China's financial sector and drive the modernization of its financial system. How significant an impact will these high-level US-China talks have on future financial market expectations? These talks carry important signaling significance within the current US-China relationship, but their immediate impact on financial markets may be limited, functioning more as 'expectation management.' - Short-term sentiment boost: The reported "basic consensuses" and the upcoming presidential meeting can temporarily alleviate market concerns about further deterioration in US-China relations, providing short-term support for risk appetite. This might prompt some sidelined capital to re-evaluate investment opportunities in the Chinese market. - Lingering structural challenges: Despite the talks, deep-seated structural competition between the US and China, especially in technology and trade, is unlikely to be fully resolved by one or a few meetings. Financial market participants will recognize that promises of openness and actual implementation may still face challenges, particularly if the Trump administration maintains a tough stance in other areas. - Focus on details, not just rhetoric: Investors will be more attentive to the concrete outcomes and policy implementations from future talks, rather than merely the rhetoric of "openness." Any specific progress on market access, data security, or foreign exchange controls will have a more substantial impact than broad macroeconomic commitments. Is the optimism from international financial institutions regarding China's financial market prospects sustainable? The optimism from international financial institutions is rooted in the immense potential of the Chinese market, but its sustainability depends on several key factors. - Market size and growth potential: China's large population base and continuous economic growth potential provide a vast market for financial products and services. This is the fundamental reason why foreign institutions remain bullish on the Chinese market. - Policy transparency and predictability: Despite China's commitment to openness, foreign institutions still have concerns regarding the transparency of policy implementation, the stability of the regulatory environment, and the predictability of issues like cross-border data flows. If these aspects continue to improve, optimism will be more resilient. - Geopolitical and policy risks: International financial institutions must weigh the attractiveness of the Chinese market against geopolitical risks and the Chinese government's policy inclination to balance economic development with national security. If geopolitical tensions escalate or policy uncertainties increase, it could erode their confidence in long-term investment.