China’s rare earth export controls to accelerate dollar collapse: Analyst

Global
Source: CointelegraphPublished: 10/19/2025, 19:28:02 EDT
Rare Earth Export Controls
Dollar Hegemony
De-dollarization
Bitcoin
Geopolitical Risk
China’s rare earth export controls to accelerate dollar collapse: Analyst

News Summary

Analyst Luke Gromen suggests that China's recent announcement of export controls on rare earth minerals signals the end of the US dollar's hegemony. These controls prohibit the sale of critical minerals to the US military-industrial complex, which Gromen argues backs the dollar's value through military force. This move prompted US President Donald Trump to announce additional 100% tariffs on China and revealed that China possesses significantly more leverage than many Western commentators admit, according to Gromen. He draws parallels to past US military interventions in Iraq and Libya, which he believes were partly to protect the monetary side of the global order. China produces over 90% of the world's rare earth minerals, and these restrictions are expected to reshape not just supply chains but the entire global monetary order. Gromen advocates for a hard money standard as the sole solution for the United States' current economic problems, touting Bitcoin (BTC) and gold as hard money assets that will see prices rise as individuals and businesses adopt them to protect purchasing power amid currency inflation. He dismisses stablecoins as a temporary fix that fails to address core currency debasement. Investment analysts at The Kobeissi Letter note that the USD is on track for its worst year since 1973, down over 10% year-to-date, and has lost 40% of its purchasing power since 2000. They predict that ongoing currency debasement will continue to drive up all asset prices as investors seek to preserve their purchasing power.

Background

Rare earth minerals are critical components in electronics manufacturing, high-tech industries, and military defense applications, playing an indispensable role in modern economies and national security. China dominates the global rare earth supply chain, producing over 90% of the world's rare earth minerals. In recent years, geopolitical tensions and trade frictions between the United States and China have escalated, particularly during Donald Trump's presidency, with intense competition across trade, technology, and national security. The US has sought to reduce its reliance on China for critical minerals, but progress has been limited. Concurrently, growing concerns globally about the US dollar's status as the world's reserve currency, as well as currency debasement and inflation, have driven investors towards alternative "hard money" assets like gold and Bitcoin.

In-Depth AI Insights

What are China's deeper strategic intentions behind the rare earth export controls, and how might this reshape the global geoeconomic landscape? - China's move is not merely retaliation for US tariffs but a strategic leveraging of its monopoly in critical minerals to signal to the world its potent economic leverage in challenging the existing international order. - The aim is to accelerate de-dollarization, encouraging other nations to explore non-USD trade and reserve settlement options, thereby diminishing the US's ability to use the dollar as a geopolitical tool. - Long-term, this will drive further regionalization and fragmentation of global supply chains, as countries prioritize developing indigenous rare earth extraction and processing capabilities or forming alliances with reliable partners, thus exacerbating the division into geopolitical blocs. - This "weaponization of resources" strategy could inspire other critical resource-producing nations to follow suit, leading to increased uncertainty and volatility in the global trading system. If the analyst's view on an accelerating dollar collapse and hard money adoption gains traction, what are the second-order implications for long-term global portfolio allocation strategies? - Investors will need to reassess the efficacy of dollar-denominated assets, such as US Treasuries, as safe havens and reserve instruments. The attractiveness of USD-denominated assets may diminish, leading to capital flows towards diversified currencies and non-sovereign assets. - "Hard money" or digital assets like gold and Bitcoin could see stronger allocation demand, becoming core tools for hedging against currency debasement and systemic risk. Their price volatility might undergo structural changes due to increased safe-haven demand and mainstream acceptance. - Asset allocation will focus more on physical assets, diversified economies with strong domestic demand, and commodities or services not reliant on USD settlement. Emerging market currencies and assets might gain relative appeal, albeit with higher political and economic risks. - Central banks globally may accelerate the diversification of their foreign exchange reserves, reducing USD holdings in favor of gold, RMB, or other non-Western currencies, profoundly impacting global FX and sovereign debt markets. In the context of "resource weaponization" and monetary system restructuring, which sectors and companies face the greatest risks and opportunities? - Sectors and companies at highest risk: Western high-tech manufacturing, defense, and electric vehicle industries heavily reliant on Chinese rare earth supplies face risks of production disruptions and soaring costs. Companies lacking diversified supply chains or alternative technologies will be particularly vulnerable. - Primary beneficiaries: Companies focused on developing rare earth substitutes, enhancing recycling technologies, or discovering new rare earth deposits will see an investment boom. Nations like Canada and Australia with rare earth resources and their associated mining companies will benefit from global supply chain restructuring and strategic investment. - Potential opportunities: Companies in digital currency infrastructure, blockchain technology, and decentralized finance (DeFi) may gain momentum due to the strengthened "hard money" narrative. Companies with strong domestic markets and technological self-sufficiency, particularly those dominating the Chinese domestic market, may demonstrate greater resilience amidst de-globalization trends.