Samsung set for highest Q3 profit in three years as AI demand lifts chip prices

News Summary
Samsung Electronics is projected to report its highest third-quarter operating profit since 2022, reaching 10.1 trillion won ($7.11 billion), a 10% increase year-on-year. This recovery is primarily driven by rising conventional memory chip prices, fueled by robust server demand and customers rebuilding inventories. While Samsung's latest high-bandwidth memory (HBM) chips have yet to be supplied to Nvidia, leading to weaker HBM sales, the strong performance of conventional memory chips has offset this. Analysts attribute the surge in demand for conventional memory chips, such as DRAM (some prices up 171.8% YoY in Q3), to hyperscalers and AI-related investments for services like ChatGPT, which are increasing workloads on general servers. Market sentiment towards Samsung's shares and chip business is improving following supply deals with major customers like OpenAI and Tesla, including a $16.5 billion foundry deal with Tesla and partnerships for OpenAI's 'Stargate' project. However, analysts caution about ongoing uncertainties, including potential U.S. tariffs on chips and China's tightened export controls on rare earth materials essential for advanced chips and manufacturing equipment.
Background
Samsung Electronics is a global leader in memory chip manufacturing and a prominent foundry service provider. Over recent years, the memory chip market has experienced cyclical fluctuations, but the rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology, particularly generative AI, has injected new growth momentum into the semiconductor industry. High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM) chips have become a critical product due to their pivotal role in AI computing. However, the global semiconductor industry also navigates a complex geopolitical landscape. The U.S. and its allies have implemented export controls on advanced chip technology to China, while China has retaliated with restrictions on critical material exports, creating supply chain uncertainties. Furthermore, President Trump's second term suggests the potential continuation of protectionist trade policies, with prospective U.S. tariffs on chips likely to further influence global semiconductor market dynamics.
In-Depth AI Insights
Why does Samsung's strong conventional memory recovery, despite HBM setbacks, signal a broader AI investment cycle? - The surge in demand for Samsung's conventional memory chips is not coincidental; it reflects the indirect but powerful impact of AI computing on backend infrastructure. While HBM directly serves AI accelerators, extensive AI workloads also demand greater memory and storage capacity for general servers, prompting data center upgrades and inventory rebuilding. - This indicates that the investment ripple effect of AI is spreading beyond front-end, high-end computing chips (like GPUs and HBM) to a broader range of semiconductor products. For investors, this implies AI-driven market opportunities are not confined to a few HBM suppliers but will progressively permeate the entire memory and server ecosystem, signaling a more sustained and widespread industry upgrade cycle. Considering Samsung's HBM lag, what are the strategic implications of its partnerships with OpenAI and Tesla for its long-term competitive position? - These collaborations transcend mere supply agreements; they are critical moves for Samsung to enhance its market standing through diversification and strengthening its foundry business, especially in the face of HBM competitive disadvantages. The foundry deal with Tesla could attract more major tech clients to its contract manufacturing, while the OpenAI partnership may open future doors for HBM or other AI-related chip supplies, even if its current HBM products aren't leading the pack. - Such high-profile partnerships help reshape market perception of Samsung's technological prowess and strategic execution, particularly when investors are cautious about its HBM progress. They convey a message that Samsung is actively positioning itself across various segments of the AI ecosystem, aiming to participate in AI-driven growth from a broader perspective, rather than being solely defined by the narrow HBM market share competition. Given Samsung's