As China Opens The World's Tallest Bridge, Grant Cardone Asks, 'When's The Last Time America Built Anything Like This?'

Global
Source: Benzinga.comPublished: 10/08/2025, 11:59:01 EDT
China Infrastructure
US Infrastructure
Grant Cardone
Infrastructure Investment
Geoeconomic Competition
As China Opens The World's Tallest Bridge, Grant Cardone Asks, 'When's The Last Time America Built Anything Like This?'

News Summary

China has inaugurated the Huajiang Grand Canyon Bridge in Guizhou province, the world's tallest bridge at 2,050 feet and the longest in a mountainous region, built in under four years. This engineering feat significantly reduces travel time and aims to boost tourism in a less developed area. Entrepreneur and investor Grant Cardone used the occasion to critique American infrastructure, questioning when the U.S. last completed such a massive project, especially within a four-year timeframe. He also highlighted a recent collapse of a Bronx public housing building due to a boiler explosion as proof of misplaced priorities and deferred maintenance in American cities, linking it to the financing of undocumented immigrants and warning of potential bank failures and failed investments. The debate on social media intensified with comparisons, such as China's new "bone glue" invention versus America's payment installment plans for pizza, underscoring a perceived disparity in innovation and national focus between the two countries.

Background

China has consistently pursued aggressive investment in infrastructure development, particularly in transportation and energy, to support economic growth and regional connectivity. Major bridge projects, high-speed rail networks, and port expansions exemplify China's reputation as an "infrastructure giant," aiming to connect remote regions, stimulate economic activity, and enhance national power. In contrast, American public infrastructure, including roads, bridges, public housing, and utilities, has faced decades of underfunding and deferred maintenance. While the Trump administration has previously pledged significant infrastructure investment, progress has been relatively slow due to political stalemates and funding allocation challenges. Comments from public figures like Grant Cardone reflect growing public concern about the state of U.S. infrastructure and its potential implications for the economy and investments.

In-Depth AI Insights

What are the strategic implications for global investors' long-term asset allocation given China's consistent success in major infrastructure projects? - China's completion of the world's tallest bridge in under four years highlights its formidable national capacity to mobilize resources and execute large-scale projects efficiently. This suggests that the Chinese economy maintains significant productivity and growth potential in specific strategic sectors, particularly in technology and engineering-intensive infrastructure. - For global investors, this implies that China's leadership in infrastructure and related construction, materials, and engineering technology sectors may further solidify, offering sustained opportunities for investment in these specific industries. It could also bolster investor confidence in China's execution capabilities for global infrastructure initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative. How might Grant Cardone's critique of U.S. infrastructure and urban priorities influence investor confidence in the American domestic market? - Cardone's comments, particularly linking the Bronx building collapse to the financing of undocumented immigrants and infrastructure maintenance, could exacerbate investor concerns about the fiscal health and long-term sustainability of American cities. This might prompt investors to re-evaluate risks associated with municipal bonds, public housing projects, and private companies reliant on local government capital expenditure. - Such a narrative, especially in 2025 post-election, could further amplify the impact of U.S. political polarization on economic decision-making and public spending, potentially leading to decreased investor confidence in U.S. domestic infrastructure-related assets and possibly driving capital towards more resilient sectors or hedging assets. How will the perceived divergence in innovation and national priorities between China and the U.S. shape international capital flows and technology investment trends in the coming years? - The social media comparison between China's "bone glue" and America's "pizza installment payments," while anecdotal, reflects a broader perception of differing national focuses on fundamental scientific research versus consumer financial innovation. This perception could lead international capital to conduct a more nuanced evaluation of each country's innovation ecosystems. - Investors might increasingly favor innovative Chinese companies with demonstrable strengths in physical engineering, material science, and industrial technology, while potentially exercising caution toward U.S. innovation primarily in software, fintech, and consumer services. This divergence could channel more venture capital and strategic investments into China's "hard tech" startups and R&D projects, while the U.S. may need to re-evaluate its investment strategies in basic research and industrial applications to maintain competitiveness.