President Trump posts cartoon image depicting him firing Fed Chief Powell

North America
Source: CNBCPublished: 09/27/2025, 18:28:02 EDT
Federal Reserve
Jerome Powell
Monetary Policy
Political Interference
Central Bank Independence
U.S. President Donald Trump passes a document to Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell to fact-check the numbers during a tour of the Federal Reserve Board building, which is currently undergoing renovations, in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 24, 2025.

News Summary

U.S. President Donald Trump posted a cartoon image on social media depicting him firing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. The image shows Trump pointing and shouting “YOU’RE FIRED!” at Powell, who is holding a box with his belongings. Trump has consistently criticized Powell for his cautious approach to interest rate cuts, nicknaming him “Too Late Powell,” despite the central bank lowering rates for the first time this year earlier this month. Powell’s term is set to end in May 2026. Firing a Fed chair would be unprecedented in the U.S., and a recent Supreme Court decision indicated the president does not have the authority to remove Fed officials at will. The Trump White House had previously criticized renovations to the Fed’s Washington headquarters, sparking suspicion that Trump might attempt to remove Powell for cause. Furthermore, Trump attempted to fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook in August over alleged mortgage fraud, with a Supreme Court ruling on that matter imminent. Financial markets have shown little reaction to these threats and attempted firings so far, but many economists and investors believe that firing Powell before his term ends could cause longer-term interest rates to rise, based on the notion that the Fed would begin to act in Trump’s interests rather than according to its dual mandate.

Background

Since his first term, President Trump has been openly critical of the Federal Reserve and its Chair, Jerome Powell, particularly regarding monetary policy. His dissatisfaction primarily stems from the Fed's interest rate decisions, which he viewed as either too rapid in hikes or too slow in cuts, thereby harming U.S. economic growth. The independence of the the Federal Reserve is crucial for it to fulfill its dual mandate from Congress: maintaining price stability and achieving maximum employment. While the president can appoint Fed governors, the law is generally interpreted as not allowing the president to remove the Chair or other governors at will. The Supreme Court has previously indicated that the president lacks the authority to remove Fed officials arbitrarily, and Powell himself has repeatedly stated that his firing is “not permitted under the law.”

In-Depth AI Insights

What are the deeper strategic implications of President Trump's repeated public attacks on Fed Chair Powell and his independence? - President Trump's persistent public attacks on Fed Chair Powell, including the use of cartoon imagery depicting his firing, are more than mere political rhetoric. This represents a strategic push to test the boundaries of institutional independence by undermining a critical economic body. - Over the long term, such actions can erode market trust in the Federal Reserve as an independent, non-political decision-maker. A decline in institutional trust increases the premium for policy uncertainty, potentially leading investors to demand higher risk-adjusted returns, especially during volatile periods. - It also risks setting a dangerous precedent for future presidents to overtly interfere with the central bank's operations, making monetary policy more susceptible to short-term political objectives rather than long-term economic health. How might the market's perception of compromised Fed independence impact long-term interest rates, the U.S. dollar, and inflation expectations? - A perceived compromise of the Fed's independence by the market could lead to a rise in long-term interest rates. Investors would demand a higher premium to compensate for the increased political risk and uncertainty in policymaking. - This perception would undermine the Fed's credibility in battling inflation. Should the market anticipate the Fed might succumb to political pressure for overly loose monetary policy, inflation expectations could rise, further pushing up long-term yields. - For the U.S. dollar, international investors might lose confidence in the stability of U.S. monetary policy, potentially leading to capital outflows and downward pressure on the currency. - Ultimately, this would result in greater volatility across financial markets and could damage the U.S.'s standing as a safe-haven asset. Does the Trump administration's attempt to fire Fed officials, including Lisa Cook and potentially Powell, signal a broader expansion of executive power? - The president's attempts to remove Fed officials, particularly when legal precedent and established norms stand in opposition, indeed signal a trend towards an expansion of executive power. This challenges not only the Fed's independence but also the system of checks and balances. - If the Supreme Court's ruling on the Lisa Cook case empowers the president's right to remove officials, even for 'cause,' it could open the door for future presidential interference in independent agencies. - This pattern might extend beyond the Fed to other independent regulatory bodies, potentially altering the balance of power between the U.S. executive branch and its regulatory apparatus. This could have profound implications for various sectors, including market regulation, environmental protection, and data privacy, introducing greater policy uncertainty and risk of politicization.