Opinion | The world financial landscape is changing. Are we ready?

Global
Source: South China Morning PostPublished: 09/26/2025, 09:55:00 EDT
Financial Market Structural Change
Digital Assets
Deglobalization
Systemic Risk
Andrew Sheng
Opinion | The world financial landscape is changing. Are we ready?

News Summary

This article explores whether current financial market shifts are cyclical or structural, concluding that we are undergoing a multidimensional, simultaneous systems change. The author argues this is not an either-or situation but a complex systemic transformation where subsystems interact to alter the whole, subsequently affecting its parts. This analytical approach is presented as more biological than the traditional physics-based view of money, finance, and the real economy. It emphasizes that finance has always been a derivative of the real economy, referencing Karl Popper's "three worlds" theory to position money between the second and third worlds as a derivative of physical goods like cowrie shells or gold. The advent of cryptocurrency illuminates how liabilities can be treated as assets through tokenization. Digitization facilitates easier divisibility and tradeability of real assets, thereby creating a complex monetary "third world"—a tokenized, tradeable financial market that can grow faster than its underlying assets.

Background

This article is penned by Andrew Sheng, a former central banker and financial regulator, and currently a distinguished fellow at the Asia Global Institute, University of Hong Kong. His perspectives often reflect a keen focus on deep structural changes within macroeconomic and financial systems. The piece discusses profound influences on financial markets, including globalization (or deglobalization), technology, demographics, climate change, and geopolitical issues. In 2025, the Trump administration's continued "America First" policies further propel deglobalization trends, intensifying debates around structural shifts in the global financial landscape. The mention of cryptocurrency and tokenization also reflects the ongoing disruption that digital financial innovation brings to traditional financial systems.

In-Depth AI Insights

How does the "multidimensional simultaneous systems change" framework challenge traditional investment strategies, particularly given the Trump administration's "America First" policies and the ongoing deglobalization trend? - Traditional investment models often rely on stable correlations and predictable cycles, which are disrupted by systemic shifts. - Deglobalization under Trump's second term exacerbates this by creating fragmented markets, supply chain reshoring, and increased trade barriers, making global diversification less effective and regional exposures more volatile. - Investors must shift from passive indexing towards active management, focusing on adaptive, resilient enterprises capable of navigating fractured global ecosystems. If finance is a "derivative of the real economy" and "tokenized financial markets can grow faster than underlying assets," what are the long-term implications for capital allocation and potential systemic risk, especially with accelerating digital asset adoption? - This divergence could lead to asset bubbles where financial valuations become increasingly decoupled from fundamental economic productivity. - Capital might be misallocated towards speculative digital assets rather than productive real economy investments. - The rapid growth of tokenized markets, while offering liquidity and divisibility, also introduces new vectors for systemic risk, including flash crashes, cyber vulnerabilities, and regulatory arbitrage, requiring robust oversight from central banks and regulators. What unique value does the article's "biological" analytical approach offer in understanding the evolution of the current global financial system, and what does it imply for investors' risk management and opportunity identification? - The biological approach emphasizes non-linearity, adaptability, and emergent properties, contrasting with traditional economics' linear, equilibrium assumptions, better capturing current market complexity and uncertainty. - It encourages investors to view the financial system as an evolving, interconnected organism rather than a mechanistic collection of parts. This implies risks are not isolated events but potential chain reactions across interacting subsystems. - Investors should focus on building portfolios with inherent resilience and adaptability, such as diversifying into innovative companies capable of navigating structural shifts, and closely monitoring for signals of potential "mutations" at critical system nodes, rather than solely relying on historical data to predict the future.