Trump's Chip Plan Could Mean Big Trouble For Apple And Dell

Global
Source: Benzinga.comPublished: 09/26/2025, 11:18:14 EDT
Apple Inc.
Dell Technologies
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co
US Semiconductor Policy
Supply Chain Risk
Tariffs
Trump's Chip Plan Could Mean Big Trouble For Apple And Dell

News Summary

The Trump administration is preparing a comprehensive plan to reduce U.S. dependence on foreign-made semiconductors and boost domestic manufacturing. The proposal would mandate that chipmakers produce the same number of semiconductors in America as their customers currently import, with companies failing to maintain this one-to-one balance facing tariffs. This policy could significantly impact companies like Apple and Dell, which rely on complex global supply chains and import products containing chips from various regions. Despite President Trump praising Apple for its U.S. investments, both Apple and analysts deem manufacturing iPhones in the U.S. unrealistic. Conversely, the initiative could benefit manufacturers expanding in the U.S., such as TSMC, Micron Technology, and GlobalFoundries, by giving them leverage over customers seeking to avoid tariffs. However, U.S. chip production costs are substantially higher than in Asia; TSMC's Arizona fab, for example, incurs costs approximately 50% higher than its Taiwan counterparts, plagued by labor shortages and rising material prices. Nonetheless, TSMC has pledged significant additional investments in the U.S.

Background

For years, Washington has expressed concerns that U.S. companies are overly reliant on chips manufactured in Taiwan, which is just 80 miles from mainland China, leaving supply chains vulnerable to geopolitical tensions. The disruption of the semiconductor supply chain during the 2020 pandemic spurred the U.S. and other nations to develop their domestic semiconductor manufacturing capabilities by reducing reliance on China. This Trump administration initiative follows the 2022 CHIPS Act, which allocated billions in subsidies for U.S. plants. However, customers often resist paying higher prices for American-made chips, which are significantly more expensive than those produced in Taiwan. For instance, TSMC's Arizona fab posted a ~$441 million loss in 2024, with its founder Morris Chang estimating U.S. chip costs to be about 50% higher than those in Taiwan.

In-Depth AI Insights

What is the true strategic intent behind the Trump administration's push for domestic chip manufacturing? Is it merely about job creation and economic independence? - Beyond the stated goals of job creation and economic independence, the core objective is to reinforce U.S. geostrategic dominance and resilience within the global tech supply chain. By reshoring critical semiconductor production, the U.S. aims to reduce reliance on potential geopolitical flashpoints like Taiwan, thereby gaining a strategic edge in the long-term technological competition with rivals like China. - It also represents an embodiment of economic nationalism, designed to ensure "Made in America" capabilities for essential technology products and defense supply chains, viewing the higher costs as an investment in national security and strategic autonomy. What profound impacts will this "one-to-one" import-to-domestic production balance policy have on the operational models of global tech giants like Apple and Dell? - Significantly increased operational costs and complexity: These companies will be forced either to drastically reconfigure their global supply chains to source U.S.-made chips or to incur substantial tariffs. Given the high cost of U.S. production, this will directly erode profit margins. - Supply chain restructuring challenges: Existing supply chains are the result of years of efficiency optimization. Mandatory localization requirements will lead to redundancy, inefficiencies, and higher logistics costs, potentially also facing short-term issues of insufficient U.S. capacity and skilled labor shortages. - Risk of competitive disadvantage: If consumers are unwilling to pay a premium for "Made in America," these companies could lose price competitiveness in international markets, especially if their competitors are not subject to similar restrictions. How will this policy reshape the global semiconductor industry's investment landscape and competitive dynamics in the long run? - Formation of a "two-track" global supply chain: It is likely to accelerate the bifurcation of the global semiconductor industry into U.S.-centric Western and Asia-centric (especially China) Eastern supply chains, leading to less efficient but more resilient regionalized production models. - Enhanced strategic value for U.S. domestic chip manufacturers: Companies like TSMC, Micron, and GlobalFoundries with U.S. fabs will gain greater bargaining power and policy support, attracting more investment, though their profitability will be persistently challenged by high operating costs. - Spurring new business models and vertical integration: In response to policy pressure, some tech giants may be compelled to engage more deeply in chip design and manufacturing processes, potentially even considering greater vertical integration to better control costs and supply chains.