Golden Cross Alert: Lithium Americas Rockets 90%+ As Trump Eyes 10% Stake

North America
Source: Benzinga.comPublished: 09/24/2025, 15:45:01 EDT
Lithium Americas Corp
Trump Administration
Lithium Mining
Critical Materials
Government Intervention
EV Supply Chain
Golden Cross Alert: Lithium Americas Rockets 90%+ As Trump Eyes 10% Stake

News Summary

Lithium Americas Corp (LAC) shares surged over 90% on Wednesday, fueled by U.S. government actions, General Motors (GM) commitments, and retail investor enthusiasm. The rally triggered a "Golden Cross" technical indicator, signaling positive momentum. The primary catalyst was reports that the Trump administration is seeking up to a 10% equity stake in LAC's Thacker Pass lithium project as part of a DOE loan renegotiation, driven by national security concerns and cheaper Chinese lithium. JPMorgan analyst Bill Peterson noted that GM's buy-in supports Thacker Pass's development but cautioned on unclear loan details and potential shareholder dilution from warrants. The surge was likely amplified by low liquidity and a short interest of around 12%, creating a short-squeeze scenario. This event highlights a broader trend: the U.S. government's increasing willingness to take direct equity stakes in companies vital to domestic supply chains, especially where China dominates. Peterson suggests this could be a template for other DOE-backed firms like Plug Power or EVgo, with strategic importance guiding future targets.

Background

Lithium Americas Corp is a company focused on lithium resource development. Its Thacker Pass project in Nevada, USA, is one of North America's largest known lithium deposits and is considered a critical component of the U.S. electric vehicle battery supply chain. The "Golden Cross" is a technical analysis indicator that forms when a short-term moving average (e.g., the 50-day SMA) crosses above a long-term moving average (e.g., the 200-day SMA). It is generally interpreted by the market as a bullish signal, indicating potential for sustained price appreciation. The Trump administration has consistently emphasized an "America First" strategy, particularly regarding critical minerals and strategic supply chains. It aims to reduce reliance on foreign nations (especially China) and supports domestic production through policies like the Inflation Reduction Act. This equity investment in Lithium Americas is the latest manifestation of its strategy to promote self-sufficiency in critical materials.

In-Depth AI Insights

What are the deeper strategic motives behind the Trump administration's equity stake demand? Beyond stated national security and reducing reliance on Chinese lithium, the Trump administration's move likely encompasses multiple strategic considerations: - Policy Signaling and Market Guidance: Sending a strong signal to the market about the government's willingness to directly intervene in critical minerals, thereby guiding private capital towards areas aligned with national strategic interests. - Geopolitical Leverage: Enhancing U.S. bargaining power and strategic influence in the global EV supply chain through direct control of critical resources, particularly in the ongoing technological competition with China. - "Government Equity" Template: Validating and promoting a model of direct government equity investment in core industries, providing a replicable framework for future interventions in other critical sectors like semiconductors or biotechnology. - Political Legacy and Voter Base: Demonstrating unwavering support for American manufacturing and jobs domestically, reinforcing the "America First" political narrative and consolidating the voter base. How might this direct government equity participation model influence the U.S. critical minerals investment landscape? This model is a double-edged sword and will have complex impacts on the investment environment: - De-risking Project Development: Direct government involvement provides significant endorsement and potential financial backing, substantially reducing the initial development risks of large, capital-intensive projects, potentially attracting more long-term capital. - Valuation Model Reshaping: Traditional valuation models will need to incorporate a "government premium" or "political risk discount," depending on the nature of government intervention. Equity stakes could lead to non-market-driven decisions, affecting long-term profitability and governance structures. - Competitive Landscape Reshaping: Companies with government backing may gain advantages in resource acquisition, approval processes, and market access, thereby altering the competitive ecosystem and creating pressure for unsupported firms. - International Investor Concerns: Some international investors may be uneasy about the government's role in private enterprises, fearing uncertainty from future policy interventions, which could affect foreign capital inflow. What challenges and opportunities will Lithium Americas face regarding long-term corporate governance and shareholder value? Lithium Americas' future trajectory will fundamentally change due to this government equity stake: - Evolving Governance Structure: As a significant shareholder, the government will likely have board representation and influence over decisions, potentially prioritizing national strategic goals over pure shareholder returns, e.g., demanding expanded capacity or accelerated production, even if not immediately commercially optimal. - Financing and Expansion Opportunities: Government backing will significantly enhance the company's creditworthiness in capital markets, potentially making it easier to secure subsequent financing and accelerate the expansion of Thacker Pass and other projects. - Market Positioning and Brand Effect: As a national strategic asset, Lithium Americas will gain a unique market position, with its products potentially prioritized for domestic supply chains and eligible for additional government contracts and incentives. - Potential Shareholder Dilution Risk: The exercise of warrants will dilute existing shareholder equity. Furthermore, if government intervention leads to impaired corporate profitability, long-term value could be affected, requiring the company to balance national interest with shareholder returns.