Microsoft says Azure affected after cables cut in the Red Sea

Middle East & Africa
Source: TechCrunchPublished: 09/07/2025, 12:38:01 EDT
Microsoft
Azure
Undersea Cables
Cloud Services
Geopolitical Risk
Network Security
Image Credits:Deb Cohn-Orbach / UCG / Universal Images Group / Getty Images

News Summary

Microsoft reported that clients of its Azure cloud platform experienced increased latency due to multiple undersea cable cuts in the Red Sea. Traffic routed through the Middle East, or destined for Asia and Europe, was specifically impacted. The company did not disclose the perpetrators or motives behind the incident. Microsoft initiated continuous monitoring, rebalancing, and optimization of network routing to mitigate customer impact. By Saturday evening, Microsoft confirmed that it was no longer detecting any issues with Azure services, indicating a swift resolution to the connectivity problems.

Background

Undersea fiber optic cables are critical components of the global internet infrastructure, carrying the vast majority of international data traffic. The Red Sea is a vital maritime chokepoint connecting Europe, Asia, and Africa, with multiple crucial communication cables transiting through it. Due to ongoing geopolitical tensions in the region, undersea infrastructure faces continuous risks, and similar incidents have occurred previously. Throughout 2025, geopolitical conflicts and shipping disruptions related to the region have escalated, further highlighting the vulnerability of infrastructure in this area and its potential impact on global trade and digital communications. This incident serves as a concrete manifestation of such risks.

In-Depth AI Insights

What does the Red Sea cable cut incident reveal about the operational resilience of cloud service providers? - This incident underscores the critical importance for global cloud service providers, such as Microsoft Azure, to build redundant and resilient network architectures within key geographical regions. While Microsoft demonstrated quick recovery, the temporary latency suggests there may still be single points of failure or areas for optimization in certain routing paths. - Investors should focus on cloud infrastructure companies that possess highly distributed data center networks, multi-path routing strategies, and advanced automated failover mechanisms globally. These capabilities are key indicators of their ability to withstand unforeseen events and ensure service continuity, directly impacting their enterprise clients' trust and business stability. What are the long-term investment implications of infrastructure risks in the Red Sea region? - The continued escalation of geopolitical tensions in the Red Sea region increases the risk premium for critical infrastructure, including undersea cables and shipping. Industries relying on this region for data transmission or logistics may need to factor in higher operating costs or invest in alternative routes. - Long-term, this could stimulate investment in alternative, more secure global connectivity solutions, such as the development of new submarine cable routes through the Arctic, enhancement of terrestrial fiber optic networks, or accelerated commercial deployment of satellite communication technologies. Providers of such technologies and infrastructure could stand to benefit. How might this incident potentially relate to global supply chains and digital transformation trends? - Disruptions to internet connectivity, even brief ones, can interfere with real-time data exchange, logistics tracking, and online collaboration within global supply chains. Given the increasing digitalization of the global economy, such incidents remind businesses of the need for more resilient digital infrastructure and business continuity plans. - This event might prompt companies to re-evaluate their choice of cloud service providers and accelerate the adoption of hybrid and multi-cloud strategies to diversify risk. It could also drive investment into emerging technologies like edge computing that offer higher security and less geographical dependence, thereby reducing centralized risks.