Google leads monster week for tech, pushing megacaps to combined $21 trillion in market cap

North America
Source: CNBCPublished: 09/06/2025, 07:45:00 EDT
Google
Apple
Broadcom
Tesla
AI Chips
Antitrust
Tech Megacaps
Broadcom shares spike briefly on Q4 beat

News Summary

It was a significant week for tech investors, with the U.S.'s eight trillion-dollar tech companies gaining a combined $420 billion in market cap, bringing their total valuation to $21 trillion, representing roughly 36% of the S&P 500. Google's antitrust case reached a resolution, with the court ruling that Google would not be forced to sell its Chrome browser but rather share search data with competitors. This decision buoyed Alphabet shares by over 10% and Apple by 3.2%, clearing the path for further AI partnerships between them. The judge cited the emergence of generative AI as a factor reshaping market dynamics. Broadcom surged 13% after securing a new $10 billion AI chip contract, reportedly with OpenAI, pushing it into the trillion-dollar club. Nvidia and Microsoft shares, however, saw declines this week. Tesla's stock climbed 5% following a proposed near-$1 trillion pay package for CEO Elon Musk, designed to keep him motivated and focused.

Background

Since 2020, the U.S. Department of Justice or Federal Trade Commission has lodged antitrust allegations against several Big Tech companies, including Google, Apple, Amazon, and Meta, aiming to curb their market dominance. A year ago, Google lost to the DOJ in an antitrust case, a decision widely seen as one of the most significant for the tech industry in over two decades. The rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence, spearheaded by new players like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Perplexity, is profoundly altering the competitive landscape of traditional search and technology markets. In the remedies ruling for Google's antitrust case, Judge Amit Mehta cited the emergence of generative AI as a major factor in his decision. Google CEO Sundar Pichai publicly thanked President Trump for the antitrust "resolution."

In-Depth AI Insights

Does the "resolution" of Google's antitrust case genuinely weaken its market dominance, or are there deeper strategic considerations at play? - On the surface, the judge's decision not to force a Chrome divestiture, instead opting for data sharing, appears to be a lenient outcome for Google. However, within the context of the Trump administration, this "resolution" might strategically prioritize maintaining U.S. tech giants' global competitiveness, especially in the AI era, by introducing specific competitive mechanisms rather than outright dismantling. - Allowing Apple and Google to continue their default search agreement and encouraging deeper AI (Gemini) collaboration suggests regulators may prefer to guide rather than disrupt existing tech ecosystems. This could be aimed at countering challenges from emerging AI players, potentially even encompassing geopolitical considerations to preserve U.S. technological superiority. Is the impact of generative AI on tech giants' market share and regulatory strategies being underestimated? - The judge explicitly stating that generative AI has altered market dynamics implies that regulators are now viewing AI as a potential self-correcting force against market monopolies. This could lead to future antitrust scrutiny of traditional tech giants shifting focus more towards competition in emerging tech sectors. - Incumbent tech giants like Google and Apple, with their vast user bases and resources, are actively integrating generative AI into their core products. While this integration might intensify market concentration in the short term, if AI truly is the "game changer" the judge suggests, it also has the potential to spawn new market leaders and disrupt the existing landscape in the long run. What are the implications of Elon Musk's massive pay package for Tesla's governance structure and investor confidence? - Such an enormous compensation plan, even with stringent performance conditions, raises potential concerns about corporate governance and shareholder interests. While intended to "motivate and retain" Musk, amidst Tesla's challenges from lower-cost Chinese EV manufacturers and an aging product lineup, this move could also be interpreted as an aggressive measure by the board to secure a critical talent. - For investors, this package represents a significant bet on Musk's individual capabilities and Tesla's future growth potential. If Tesla achieves its trillion-dollar market cap targets, the rewards will be substantial; conversely, it could exacerbate shareholder questions regarding the company's long-term strategy and valuation sustainability.